GST Registration from Co-working Spaces: Legal Hurdles, Court Rulings & Solutions
Riya Thawani
Riya Thawani is a Chartered Accountant and the founder of CA Riya Thawani & Company. With strong expertise in taxation, GST compliance, and business advisory, she assists individuals and startups with financial planning and legal compliance. She is passionate about simplifying tax laws for professionals and entrepreneurs through insightful articles and workshops.
Many people seek answers to questions such as: How do I register for GST using a co-working space? Can a co-working space serve as a registered office? Can I use a virtual office for GST registration? What is the difference between an office space and a co-working space? What type of business model does a co-working space represent? This article aims to address these concerns.
In recent years, co-working spaces have transformed the traditional idea of office work. Startups, freelancers, and even established businesses have embraced shared office environments for their flexibility, cost efficiency, and community benefits. However, while the co-working concept may be revolutionizing the modern workspace, it has also encountered some unforeseen hurdles, one of the most prominent being Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration challenges.
This article explores the legal tussle, compliance issues, and interpretation difficulties surrounding GST registration in co-working spaces, particularly when multiple entities use the same address for GST purposes.
GST Implications of Co-working Spaces
Co-working spaces are typically shared by several independent businesses. Each tenant often operates separately and may want to obtain GST registration using the address of the co-working facility. According to GST norms, any business that exceeds the prescribed turnover threshold or engages in interstate supply is required to register under GST. The address used during registration must be that of the principal place of business.
This is where the first challenge arises: when multiple GST registrations are applied for using the same address, that of the co-working space, it raises concerns with GST officers. Authorities may view multiple registrations from the same premises with suspicion, assuming they might be fake or shell companies created for tax evasion. Consequently, even genuine businesses operating out of co-working spaces face rejection or delays during GST registration.
Legal Framework under GST: What the Law Says
Under the CGST Rules, a valid address proof must be submitted at the time of GST registration. This usually includes documents like the rent agreement, electricity bill, property tax receipt, or an NOC (No Objection Certificate) from the property owner.
In co-working setups, businesses often have limited tenancy rights or licenses rather than traditional lease agreements. This leads to complications in providing acceptable documentation. Some GST officers have insisted on exclusive possession of the premises as a condition for registration—an impractical requirement in a shared workspace.
Challenges Faced by Startups and Freelancers
Startups and new-age entrepreneurs are among the biggest patrons of co-working models. For them, navigating GST compliance becomes disproportionately hard due to:
- Frequent rejections based on shared address concerns
- Delays in approvals, leading to interruptions in business operations
- Difficulty in obtaining input tax credit due to mismatches in address validation
- Repeated clarifications and notices from the GST departments
Additionally, freelancers and consultants using flexible desk arrangements often lack fixed workspaces, which makes documentation more difficult. In some cases, co-working providers themselves refuse to give NOCs or tenancy proof due to fear of scrutiny.
Departmental Perspective: Risk Mitigation
From the GST department’s point of view, curbing tax evasion is a priority. Shell companies often operate from non-existent or temporary premises, leading to revenue leakage. Therefore, officers have been instructed to apply rigorous verification in cases where:
- Several GST registrations originate from the same address
- No physical evidence of business operations is found
- The business is involved in high-risk sectors like trading or commission agencies
However, the issue arises when these anti-evasion measures are misapplied to legitimate startups and co-working tenants, resulting in undue hardship.
Solutions and the Way Forward
To resolve this impasse, a multi-pronged approach is required:
- Standardized Documentation
GST laws should provide a clear list of acceptable documents for co-working tenants, such as license agreements, rent receipts, or service invoices from workspace providers. This would avoid arbitrary rejection based on documentation. - Recognition of Co-working Spaces in GST Portal
The GSTN portal should be updated to formally recognize co-working spaces and to enable tagging of multiple registrations under a unified master address with distinct suite or cubicle identifiers. - Policy Circular from CBIC
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) could issue a clarifying circular, instructing officers not to reject applications purely based on shared addresses and to allow virtual or shared workspaces with proper verification. - Technology-led Verification
Authorities could conduct video verification or geotagging to establish the physical presence of applicants at shared workspaces. This is better than outright denial based on suspicion. - Capacity Building of Officers
Training GST officials to understand the modern startup ecosystem, including co-working, gig economy, and remote working models, is crucial for adapting to today’s business realities.
The battle for GST registration from co-working spaces reflects the growing pains of India’s evolving tax framework, trying to keep pace with modern business models. While the intent to curb tax evasion is valid, denying legitimate entrepreneurs the right to register under GST due to rigid interpretations undermines the objective of inclusive economic growth.
A forward-looking approach—rooted in technology, legal clarity, and administrative flexibility—can help create a fair and enabling environment for all types of businesses. With judicial support growing and startups playing a critical role in India’s economy, it’s time the GST regime fully accommodates the co-working revolution.
For any clarifications or queries, please feel free to reach out to us at admin@fintracadvisors.com
Disclaimer
The content published on this blog is for informational purposes only. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fintrac Advisors. No warranties are made regarding this information’s completeness, reliability, or accuracy. Any action taken based on the information presented in this blog is strictly at the reader’s own risk, and we will not be liable for any losses or damages resulting from its use. It is recommended that professional expertise be sought for such matters.
