Drafting the Statutory Audit Report – Key Clauses and Disclosures?
CA Gagan Gupta
Founder & Principal, Kishnani & Associates
CA Gagan Gupta is a seasoned Chartered Accountant with extensive expertise in taxation, audit, financial consulting, and business advisory. A fellow member of the ICAI since 2021, he has been practicing since 2016, providing strategic financial solutions to businesses, startups, and individuals. Under his leadership, Kishnani & Associates delivers precise and ethical financial services, ensuring seamless regulatory compliance and sustainable growth for clients.
The statutory audit report stands as the most crucial communication between auditors and stakeholders. It translates the auditor’s examination of financial statements into a concise, professional opinion that influences investor confidence, governance decisions, and compliance outcomes. Drafting such a report requires precision, objectivity, and a sound understanding of the applicable standards. Every clause, disclosure, and observation included in the report carries meaning—and often consequences.
This article explores the key elements, essential clauses, and significant disclosures that shape a well-drafted statutory audit report, alongside the thought process that auditors must employ to ensure transparency and compliance.
1. The Purpose and Structure of a Statutory Audit Report
A statutory audit report provides an independent opinion on whether the financial statements present a true and fair view of an entity’s financial position and performance. Governed by Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Standards on Auditing (SAs) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), the report serves as a formal expression of professional assurance.
The structure of the report, as guided by SA 700 (Revised)—Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements, is standardized to ensure uniformity and comparability. A typical audit report includes:
a. Title and Addressee
b. Auditor’s Opinion
c. Basis for Opinion
d. Key Audit Matters (KAMs)
e. Management’s Responsibilities
f. Auditor’s Responsibilities
g. Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
h. Signature, Date, and Place of Signature
Each of these components plays a distinct role in communicating the auditor’s findings and the scope of their work.
2. The Auditor’s Opinion – The Core Statement
The opinion paragraph forms the crux of the audit report. It conveys the auditor’s conclusion on whether the financial statements comply with the prescribed accounting framework and fairly depict the financial results.
The auditor’s opinion may be:
a. Unmodified (Clean Report): When financial statements are prepared in all material respects in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
b. Qualified Opinion: When there are material misstatements, but they are not pervasive.
c. Adverse Opinion: When misstatements are both material and pervasive, leading to an unfair presentation.
d. Disclaimer of Opinion: When the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient evidence to form an opinion.
Clarity and conciseness are vital here—any ambiguity can create uncertainty for stakeholders. The language should strictly align with SA 700 and SA 705 (Modifications to the Opinion).
3. Basis for Opinion – The Supporting Ground
This section outlines the standards followed, ethical requirements observed, and the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained. It assures users that the opinion is grounded in systematic procedures and not personal judgment.
For example, the auditor must state adherence to the Standards on Auditing, confirm independence as per the Code of Ethics, and declare that sufficient evidence was gathered. This transparency reinforces the credibility of the audit process.
4. Key Audit Matters (KAMs) – Highlighting Critical Areas
Introduced under SA 701, the Key Audit Matters (KAMs) section identifies areas that were of most significance during the audit. These matters are selected based on professional judgment and typically include complex transactions, valuation judgments, revenue recognition, and contingent liabilities.
The purpose of KAMs is not to express a separate opinion but to enhance communication between auditors and stakeholders. It highlights where significant management judgment was involved or where the auditor’s procedures were most intensive.
For instance, in an entity heavily involved in construction contracts, revenue recognition and percentage-of-completion estimates might be reported as KAMs due to their inherent subjectivity.
5. Management’s Responsibilities for Financial Statements
This clause reminds stakeholders that management, not auditors, bears primary responsibility for preparing financial statements that reflect a true and fair view. It also acknowledges management’s role in establishing internal controls and assessing the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The auditor’s inclusion of this clause serves both as a professional safeguard and as an educational disclosure, clarifying boundaries between management accountability and auditor responsibility.
6. Auditor’s Responsibilities Section
Following SA 700 (Revised) and SA 210, this section describes the auditor’s obligation to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement—whether due to fraud or error. It emphasizes the limitations of audit procedures and explains that an audit involves exercising professional judgment and skepticism.
Additionally, the auditor should mention that risk assessment, evaluation of accounting policies, and appraisal of internal controls form parts of the audit process. The description must be clear enough for non-technical readers to understand the auditor’s role, yet sufficiently technical to maintain professional accuracy.
7. Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Under Section 143(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, auditors are required to include specific statements and observations. These include:
a. Whether all information and explanations were obtained.
b. Whether proper books of account have been kept.
c. Whether the balance sheet and profit and loss account are in agreement with the books.
d. Whether the financial statements comply with accounting standards.
e. Observations on director disqualification under Section 164(2).
f. Adequacy and operating effectiveness of internal financial controls over financial reporting.
g. Any adverse comments on managerial remuneration or related party transactions.
Additionally, other regulatory requirements may stem from the CARO (Companies Auditor’s Report Order), which mandates specific disclosures on areas such as inventory management, loan defaults, fraud reporting, and statutory dues. These requirements enhance the audit’s depth and provide regulators with a consistent compliance assessment.
8. Signature, Date, and Place – The Authentication Clause
The closing part of the report includes the auditor’s signature, membership number, firm registration number, date, and place of signing. The date indicates when sufficient appropriate evidence was obtained, while the place signifies where the report was finalized.
These details, though procedural, carry legal and professional significance, as they determine accountability and traceability of the audit process.
9. Emphasis of Matter and Other Matter Paragraphs
As per SA 706, auditors may include Emphasis of Matter or Other Matter paragraphs to draw attention to issues that are crucial to understanding the financial statements or audit scope.
a. Emphasis of Matter: Highlights significant disclosures already included in the financial statements (e.g., uncertainty regarding pending litigation).
b. Other Matter: Refers to matters not presented in the financial statements but relevant to understanding the audit report (e.g., audit of another component by a different auditor).
These paragraphs add clarity without altering the auditor’s opinion.
10. The Need for Balanced Judgment and Clarity
While templates guide format, the real skill in drafting lies in balancing technical compliance with clarity. Overly technical language may alienate readers, while oversimplification could misrepresent the auditor’s opinion.
An auditor must also ensure consistency between audit evidence and disclosures, avoid generic wording, and exercise professional judgment when describing sensitive matters like suspected fraud or going concern issues.
Ultimately, the report must convey confidence, transparency, and objectivity—without ambiguity.
Conclusion
Drafting a statutory audit report is not a mechanical process; it is the culmination of professional judgment, ethical responsibility, and regulatory precision. Each clause and disclosure is a bridge between financial data and stakeholder trust.
A well-crafted report not only meets statutory requirements but also upholds the integrity of financial reporting in the eyes of shareholders, regulators, and the public. In essence, the statutory audit report is more than a compliance document—it is the voice of assurance in the corporate governance ecosystem.
For any clarifications or queries, please feel free to reach out to us at admin@fintracadvisors.com
Disclaimer
The content published on this blog is for informational purposes only. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fintrac Advisors. No warranties are made regarding this information’s completeness, reliability, or accuracy. Any actions taken based on the information presented in this blog are solely at the reader’s risk, and we will not be liable for any losses or damages resulting from its use. It is recommended that professional expertise be sought for such matters. External links on this blog may direct users to third-party sites beyond our control. We do not take responsibility for their nature, content, or availability

