Mon - Fri : 9:30 AM - 5:30 PM
admin@fintracadvisors.com
Talk To Our Expert
Have Any Questions?
Talk To Our Expert
Have Any Questions?
Fintrac Advisors
Fintrac Advisors Fintrac Advisors
Apr 21, 2026 .

PPM Certification for AIF: Role of Merchant Banker

NSE EBP guidelines

CS Neeraj Jain

Mr Neeraj Jain is the Partner  of Expert Global Consultants Private Limited

A SEBI Registered Category -1 Merchant Banker
operating out of  New Delhi and providing Pan India Services

In India’s alternative investment landscape, documentation is not just a regulatory necessity—it is a credibility tool. Among these documents, the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) holds a central position for Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). While fund managers often view it as a compliance requirement, investors treat it as the primary lens to evaluate risk, governance, and intent. This is where certification of the PPM by a Merchant Banker assumes significance.

Over time, the role of Merchant Bankers in certifying PPMs has evolved from a checkbox activity to a responsibility that directly impacts investor confidence and regulatory scrutiny.

 

Understanding the Purpose of PPM Certification

A PPM is essentially the blueprint of an AIF scheme. It outlines the investment strategy, risk factors, fee structure, governance framework, and operational mechanics of the fund. Given its importance, regulators have emphasized the need for an independent review before the document reaches investors.

Certification by a Merchant Banker serves as a layer of assurance that:

  • The disclosures are consistent and not misleading 
  • The structure of the fund aligns with regulatory norms 
  • Risk factors are adequately and fairly presented 

It is important to note that certification is not a guarantee of returns or performance. Instead, it is an informed validation of disclosures and structural compliance.

 

Regulatory Backdrop and Intent

The introduction of mandatory PPM certification reflects a broader shift towards transparency in the AIF ecosystem. Regulators have increasingly focused on ensuring that investors—particularly sophisticated and institutional participants—receive clear, comparable, and standardized information.

The move also addresses a common gap: fund documents drafted with legal precision but lacking clarity for investors. Merchant Bankers act as intermediaries who bridge this gap by applying both regulatory understanding and market experience.

 

Scope of Review by Merchant Bankers

The certification process typically involves a detailed review of multiple aspects of the PPM. While the exact scope may vary depending on the fund category and structure, certain areas remain consistent:

  1. Investment Strategy and Objectives

The Merchant Banker evaluates whether the strategy described is coherent, measurable, and aligned with the category of AIF. Vague or overly broad mandates are often flagged for refinement.

  1. Risk Disclosures

One of the most critical components, risk disclosures must go beyond generic statements. The certifier ensures that risks specific to the asset class, geography, and investment style are clearly articulated.

  1. Fee and Expense Structure

Transparency in fees is essential. Hidden charges or ambiguous language around expenses can raise red flags. Certification involves checking whether all costs are explicitly disclosed.

  1. Governance and Conflict Management

The presence of conflict-of-interest scenarios is common in fund structures. What matters is how they are disclosed and mitigated. Merchant Bankers review these frameworks carefully.

  1. Legal and Structural Consistency

The PPM must align with other fund documents such as trust deeds or contribution agreements. Any inconsistencies can lead to investor disputes later.

 

Practical Challenges in Certification

While the framework appears straightforward, the process of certification is rarely mechanical. Merchant Bankers often encounter practical challenges that require judgment and experience.

One recurring issue is the tendency of fund managers to use templated language that does not fully reflect the fund’s actual strategy. This creates a mismatch between documentation and execution.

Another challenge lies in balancing regulatory compliance with commercial flexibility. Overly rigid disclosures can limit operational freedom, while overly broad language can trigger regulatory concerns.

Timelines can also be tight, especially when fund launches are linked to market opportunities. In such cases, the quality of certification depends on early engagement rather than last-minute review.

 

Why Certification Matters Beyond Compliance

From an investor’s perspective, a certified PPM carries more weight than an uncertified one. It signals that the fund has undergone an independent review, which reduces information asymmetry.

For fund managers, the benefits are equally tangible:

  • Improved credibility during fundraising 
  • Reduced risk of regulatory queries 
  • Better alignment between internal teams and documented strategy 

In a competitive fundraising environment, these factors can make a meaningful difference.

 

Evolving Expectations from Merchant Bankers

The expectations from Merchant Bankers are no longer limited to identifying gaps. They are increasingly expected to provide practical inputs on improving clarity, structure, and investor communication.

This shift has transformed the certification process into a collaborative exercise rather than a one-sided review. The best outcomes are often achieved when fund managers involve Merchant Bankers early in the drafting stage.

 

Conclusion

PPM certification for AIFs is not merely a regulatory formality—it is a cornerstone of transparency and trust in the alternative investment ecosystem. As the market matures, the quality of disclosures will play a defining role in attracting and retaining investors.

Merchant Bankers, through their certification role, contribute to this ecosystem by ensuring that what is promised on paper is clear, consistent, and compliant. For fund managers, approaching certification as a value-adding exercise rather than a procedural hurdle can lead to stronger investor relationships and smoother regulatory interactions.

Disclaimer

The material presented on this blog is intended solely for informational purposes. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fintrac Advisors. No warranties are made regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information. Any actions taken based on the information presented in this blog are solely at the reader’s risk, and we will not be liable for any losses or damages resulting from its use. Seeking professional expertise for such matters is strongly recommended. External links on this blog may direct users to third-party sites beyond our control. We do not take responsibility for their nature, content, or availability.

For any clarifications or queries, please feel free to reach out to us at: admin@fintracadvisors.com

Contact Info

Mon - Fri : 9:30 AM - 5:30 PM
admin@fintracadvisors.com

Our Presence

Kolkata
Bengaluru
Mumbai
Delaware