Why Does a Trademark Application Get Objected To?

Reasons for the Objection and Rejection of a Trademark Application

Securing a trademark is one of the most effective ways for a business to legally protect its brand identity. However, many applicants are surprised when the Trademark Registry issues an objection—or worse, rejects the application entirely. While the process may seem complex, the underlying reasons are often predictable. Understanding them upfront helps applicants file stronger, cleaner, and more defensible marks.

Below is a uniquely crafted breakdown of why trademark applications get objected to and what commonly leads to rejection.

1. The Trademark Lacks Distinctiveness

A trademark must be able to differentiate your goods or services from those offered by others. When the applied mark is generic, overly descriptive, or too common in the trade, the Registry objects.

Examples:

a. Using “Pure Milk” for dairy products
b. Filing “Fast Delivery” for courier services

Marks that directly describe features, quality, or purpose rarely qualify for protection because they do not help consumers identify a specific source.

2. Similarity with an Existing Registered or Pending Trademark

The most frequent reason for objection is confusion in the marketplace. If the examining officer finds that your mark resembles an already registered or pending mark—visually, phonetically, or conceptually—the trademark is flagged.

Even slight alterations like adding a letter, using a similar logo shape, or changing the spelling may not be enough to avoid confusion.

For example:
“ZERE” may be objected to for similarity to “ZERO” if it targets the same goods or services.

3. Incorrect or Incomplete Trademark Classification

The Nice Classification system governs trademark classes.
If the applicant selects the wrong class, uses unclear descriptions, or misses relevant goods/services, the application becomes procedurally defective.

Typical classification issues:

a. Filing under Class 25 for clothing, but forgetting accessories
b. Overly broad descriptions like “all goods included.”
c. Using outdated class terminology

Procedural errors often lead to objections, and unresolved ones may end in rejection.

4. Descriptive, Laudatory, or Commonly Used Phrases

Trademarks cannot monopolize words that others in the industry need to use.

Examples of such phrases:

a. “Best Quality”
b. “Organic Fresh”
c. “Super Saver”

Since these terms directly describe characteristics, they lack the uniqueness needed for legal protection.

5. Use of Prohibited, Restricted, or Misleading Elements

Certain symbols and words are never allowed in trademarks unless proper permissions are provided.

These include:

a. Government emblems or insignia
b. National flags
c. Religious symbols in improper contexts
d. Words that mislead about quality or origin (e.g., “Doctor-certified,” “Government approved”)

Any misleading or prohibited element attracts immediate objection.

6. Insufficient Evidence of Prior Use (When Claimed)

If an applicant claims “prior use,” they must support it with evidence such as:

a. Invoices
b. Website snapshots
c. Advertisements
d. Product labels

Weak, missing, or mismatched documents commonly trigger objections. Without convincing evidence, the claim of prior use may be rejected.

7. Geographical Terms or Surnames Used as Trademarks

The Registry typically does not grant exclusive rights over names that belong to the public domain.

Examples:

a. “Bangalore Spices”
b. “Sharma & Co. Textiles”

Unless you can prove long and exclusive use that has led to a secondary meaning, such marks often face objections.

8. Offensive, Immoral, or Public-Policy-Contradicting Marks

Marks that violate public morality, promote illegal activities, or offend social, cultural, or national sentiments are outright rejected.

For example:

a. Profane or abusive words
b. Symbols that disrespect religious groups
c. Marks promoting drugs or unlawful activities

Public policy grounds lead to instant refusal.

9. Poor Quality Representation of the Mark

Logos or device marks must be uploaded clearly and consistently.

Objections arise due to:

a. Blurry logos
b. Inconsistent color claims
c. Mismatch between uploaded mark and description

Any technical mismatch can stall the entire application.

10.  Failure to Respond to Examination Reports

A surprisingly common reason for rejection is simple non-compliance.

If the applicant:

a. Fails to respond within 30 days
b. Responds inadequately
c. Ignores specific objections

The application ultimately gets rejected for non-prosecution.

Conclusion

A trademark application is objected to or rejected not merely because of legal technicalities but because the law aims to preserve fairness, prevent confusion, and maintain clarity in the marketplace. Most objections can be resolved with proper drafting, precise classification, thorough evidence, and a clear understanding of what makes a trademark distinctive.

A well-prepared application not only smoothens registration but also strengthens the long-term enforceability of the brand.

For any clarifications or queries, please feel free to reach out to us at admin@fintracadvisors.com 

Disclaimer

The content published on this blog is for informational purposes only. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fintrac Advisors. No warranties are made regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information. Any actions taken based on the information presented in this blog are solely at the reader’s risk, and we will not be liable for any losses or damages resulting from its use. It is recommended that professional expertise be sought for such matters. External links on this blog may direct users to third-party sites beyond our control. We do not take responsibility for their nature, content, or availability.